TSOT015: Dots Connecting
Jul 30, 2020, 03:02 PM
On social media I created a video slideshow with the basics of a logic chain laid out in about 4 minutes as to why to have a more critical eye on both the origin of this virus and on its main cheerleader. I do that here, and then go through the sources I used and add analysis and commentary.
[On social media I created a video slideshow with the basics of a logic chain laid out in about 4 minutes as to why to have a more critical eye on both the origin of this virus and on its main cheerleader. I do that here, and then go through the sources I used and add analysis and further commentary. After creating two videos and absorbing the material more, this has more interstitial aspects of connecting things than do the two videos]
The outline of the logic chain is below.
1. In October 2014, N.I.H. halts new funding of "gain-of-function" experimentation in viruses. It is one thing to study a virus, another to engineer to make it worse or to allow it to cross species.
2. Soon after, STILL in '14, the bad doctor, who has a HISTORY of espousing and defending gain-of-function virus experimentation is instrumental in EXPORTING the research.
3. He not only exports it. He exports it to the United States' KEY RIVAL, and the KEY RIVAL to the philosophy of freedom... CHINA.
4. That is, the bad doctor is instrumental in exporting "make viruses more dangerous" research, funded with U.S. money, to the ONLY Level Four lab in ALL of China, so they can do the VERY research that WE have stopped doing. The lab attains "level 4" status in '15, ONLY after this "research" starts.
5. This ban is not lifted until December 2017. And then, if a review panel approves the proposed studies.
6. We already have enough for treason. Plain and simple.
7. That lab is in... Wuhan.* It worked on bat coronaviruses.
8. U.S. Embassy officials visit the lab in '18, after which they send diplomatic cables expressing their concern over what they consider the inadequacy of the lab's expertise and safety mechanisms.
9. The "pandemic" begins.
10. After initial denials, U.S. intelligence announces the virus could have escaped from a lab.
11. A Nobel Prize winner (Montagnier) says on French TV, in no uncertain terms, that his team concludes the virus is built on a bat virus but is clearly the product of genetic engineering on top of that virus.
12. It is easy to find articles about its striking uniqueness in some ways compared to what should be its sister viruses. This is quite in line with it being engineered.
The outline of the logic chain is below.
1. In October 2014, N.I.H. halts new funding of "gain-of-function" experimentation in viruses. It is one thing to study a virus, another to engineer to make it worse or to allow it to cross species.
2. Soon after, STILL in '14, the bad doctor, who has a HISTORY of espousing and defending gain-of-function virus experimentation is instrumental in EXPORTING the research.
3. He not only exports it. He exports it to the United States' KEY RIVAL, and the KEY RIVAL to the philosophy of freedom... CHINA.
4. That is, the bad doctor is instrumental in exporting "make viruses more dangerous" research, funded with U.S. money, to the ONLY Level Four lab in ALL of China, so they can do the VERY research that WE have stopped doing. The lab attains "level 4" status in '15, ONLY after this "research" starts.
5. This ban is not lifted until December 2017. And then, if a review panel approves the proposed studies.
6. We already have enough for treason. Plain and simple.
7. That lab is in... Wuhan.* It worked on bat coronaviruses.
8. U.S. Embassy officials visit the lab in '18, after which they send diplomatic cables expressing their concern over what they consider the inadequacy of the lab's expertise and safety mechanisms.
9. The "pandemic" begins.
10. After initial denials, U.S. intelligence announces the virus could have escaped from a lab.
11. A Nobel Prize winner (Montagnier) says on French TV, in no uncertain terms, that his team concludes the virus is built on a bat virus but is clearly the product of genetic engineering on top of that virus.
12. It is easy to find articles about its striking uniqueness in some ways compared to what should be its sister viruses. This is quite in line with it being engineered.