QROT-04: "Solution 90% effective!" If we measure differently than we have this whole time.
May 26, 2021, 07:27 AM
A lookback to an 11/9/2020 Pf-lie-zer propaganda piece on how well development of their "solution" was going.
Remember all that "YOU HAVE IT EVEN IF YOU DON'T KNOW IT IF THE 'RESULTS' SAY YOU DO!!! YOU DON'T HAVE TO EVEN BE COUGHING. STOP BEING IRRESPONSIBLE!!!"?
How could you forget.
But when the liars want to validate their Big Pharma "solution" with progress update propaganda... THEN they count their solution as not working only if SYMPTOMS arise.
11:32 Smoking gun part of article - if there's no symptoms, our solution must be good!
You've been telling us all along that a lack of symptoms is not the point, and now your "90% EFFECTIVE" propaganda headline is based on whether people do not have symptoms???
==================================================
0:00 Intro of logic - marketing often misanalyzes what the science REALLY means, and just twist it for marketing reasons.
1:15 What article? "[Pf-Lie-zer] says [Big Pharma 'solution'] is looking 90% effective." A.P., Linda Johnson, et al.
1:49 ASIDE - marketing leading science, further explained, with PCR tech as the example. What it MADE sense for, versus how it was used anyway.
3:01 Delving into article. For some reason includes election propaganda statement too.
4:35: They've come to this conclusion upon only looking at 94 patients of an eventual 44,000??? That tells us... NOTHING. How did they select this stopping point for their "interim analysis" current conclusion?
6:00 ASIDE: effects of something being "covered" financially 100%.
6:46: Back to article.
6:56: Former Chief of FDA's vacks division speaks backwards. "Extremely promising" but "need to see the data." ummm... no.. it's NOT promising, because you don't KNOW anything yet.
7:55 Another expert makes my point - the propaganda headline and "promising results" is no more than an "interesting first signal."
8:20 Whole markets being "buoyed" by whom?? NO one has been buoyed by that man... ever. Errrbuddy knows.
9:37 Pf-LIE-zer's CEO saying words to make you believe he has human empathy. And adds other lies ("the end of so much work"???)
ASIDE on Fearci's regular routine of not REALLY saying anything except you could be safer.
11:32 Smoking gun part of article - if there's no symptoms, our solution must be good!
11:41 Let's... repeat that!
11:40 Repeat smoking gun.
12:03 Commentary on how it is that now a lack of symptoms means we must NOT have it, when all along we've said the opposite?
Believe the data, not the reality in front of you. Believe the matrix.
16:06 PCR over sensitivity analysis - magnifying past pixelization of an "evidence" photo.
18:45 Emphasis on effect of mandates overtaking free enterprise (/ selective non-skepticism of corporations by the left)
Are you getting the game yet? Step One: They Lie. Step Two: You decide whether to believe their lie. Step Three: Repeat.
(Explicit is just for a handful of (aggressive) curses)
Remember all that "YOU HAVE IT EVEN IF YOU DON'T KNOW IT IF THE 'RESULTS' SAY YOU DO!!! YOU DON'T HAVE TO EVEN BE COUGHING. STOP BEING IRRESPONSIBLE!!!"?
How could you forget.
But when the liars want to validate their Big Pharma "solution" with progress update propaganda... THEN they count their solution as not working only if SYMPTOMS arise.
11:32 Smoking gun part of article - if there's no symptoms, our solution must be good!
You've been telling us all along that a lack of symptoms is not the point, and now your "90% EFFECTIVE" propaganda headline is based on whether people do not have symptoms???
==================================================
0:00 Intro of logic - marketing often misanalyzes what the science REALLY means, and just twist it for marketing reasons.
1:15 What article? "[Pf-Lie-zer] says [Big Pharma 'solution'] is looking 90% effective." A.P., Linda Johnson, et al.
1:49 ASIDE - marketing leading science, further explained, with PCR tech as the example. What it MADE sense for, versus how it was used anyway.
3:01 Delving into article. For some reason includes election propaganda statement too.
4:35: They've come to this conclusion upon only looking at 94 patients of an eventual 44,000??? That tells us... NOTHING. How did they select this stopping point for their "interim analysis" current conclusion?
6:00 ASIDE: effects of something being "covered" financially 100%.
6:46: Back to article.
6:56: Former Chief of FDA's vacks division speaks backwards. "Extremely promising" but "need to see the data." ummm... no.. it's NOT promising, because you don't KNOW anything yet.
7:55 Another expert makes my point - the propaganda headline and "promising results" is no more than an "interesting first signal."
8:20 Whole markets being "buoyed" by whom?? NO one has been buoyed by that man... ever. Errrbuddy knows.
9:37 Pf-LIE-zer's CEO saying words to make you believe he has human empathy. And adds other lies ("the end of so much work"???)
ASIDE on Fearci's regular routine of not REALLY saying anything except you could be safer.
11:32 Smoking gun part of article - if there's no symptoms, our solution must be good!
11:41 Let's... repeat that!
11:40 Repeat smoking gun.
12:03 Commentary on how it is that now a lack of symptoms means we must NOT have it, when all along we've said the opposite?
Believe the data, not the reality in front of you. Believe the matrix.
16:06 PCR over sensitivity analysis - magnifying past pixelization of an "evidence" photo.
18:45 Emphasis on effect of mandates overtaking free enterprise (/ selective non-skepticism of corporations by the left)
Are you getting the game yet? Step One: They Lie. Step Two: You decide whether to believe their lie. Step Three: Repeat.
(Explicit is just for a handful of (aggressive) curses)