QROT-035: CDC admits basic facts we reported many times in the last year. 20 months After Science Told Them
Jan 03, 2022, 08:57 PM
No less than the CDC director admits:
1. The basic diagnostic can be false positive for 12 weeks after infection. Her audio included.
Of course she does not and will not say "the test is bad" and she very artificially avoids the term "false positive." But she admits the equivalent - she says the PCR could stay positive for twelve weeks, which she says is "long after" someone is transmissible.
2. And she admits something I talked about over a year and a half ago, that the early garbage of "it's so dangerous because of how long you could have it and still transmit it unknowingly" is garbage. A year and a half ago I said it is on average five days, not 14. Fourteen days or longer is the outlier. So here she admits that 85% of transmissibility occurs within five days.
And we have her being committed to this message. She clearly says this over and over again, as direct questions to challenging answers from collectivist propagandists that ask her why she would dare only recommend a mere five days of self-isolation.
Also, an example of perception management in the form of a "scientific" type (a former Surgeon General!) acting as though any of this is not scientific or is just for the economy. When no doubt that person knows the reason they are abandoning the test is because it does not even apply.
The test, if it ever wasn't*, is certainly garbage now.
Straight and simple.
But of course it is nice to hear someone admit it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
*These admissions are very heavy circumstantial evidence that it always was garbage. After all, if the only "positive" portion of using the original PCR test for Omicron was whether it matched for the "more stable" regions of the coronavirus it tests, then how is it that those were ever positive for way too long??
-------------------------------------------------------------------
It is time to simply outright say the emergency is ended. It is only because of "emergency" that the regular Constitutional limits are allowed. So the Congress should plainly and simply say the emergency is over. That puts the legal argument back into a totally different context.
1. The basic diagnostic can be false positive for 12 weeks after infection. Her audio included.
Of course she does not and will not say "the test is bad" and she very artificially avoids the term "false positive." But she admits the equivalent - she says the PCR could stay positive for twelve weeks, which she says is "long after" someone is transmissible.
2. And she admits something I talked about over a year and a half ago, that the early garbage of "it's so dangerous because of how long you could have it and still transmit it unknowingly" is garbage. A year and a half ago I said it is on average five days, not 14. Fourteen days or longer is the outlier. So here she admits that 85% of transmissibility occurs within five days.
And we have her being committed to this message. She clearly says this over and over again, as direct questions to challenging answers from collectivist propagandists that ask her why she would dare only recommend a mere five days of self-isolation.
Also, an example of perception management in the form of a "scientific" type (a former Surgeon General!) acting as though any of this is not scientific or is just for the economy. When no doubt that person knows the reason they are abandoning the test is because it does not even apply.
The test, if it ever wasn't*, is certainly garbage now.
Straight and simple.
But of course it is nice to hear someone admit it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
*These admissions are very heavy circumstantial evidence that it always was garbage. After all, if the only "positive" portion of using the original PCR test for Omicron was whether it matched for the "more stable" regions of the coronavirus it tests, then how is it that those were ever positive for way too long??
-------------------------------------------------------------------
It is time to simply outright say the emergency is ended. It is only because of "emergency" that the regular Constitutional limits are allowed. So the Congress should plainly and simply say the emergency is over. That puts the legal argument back into a totally different context.