How to tell when a "climate activist" is just a mascot to change the world in a different way?
When she speaks at a body that perfectly well has the power to stop any number of very specific threats to human (and all other) biology but chooses to stop none of them. But still uses a tiny, quite-outraged mascot to promote the idea of global control to "save the world."
And how this ties into another interpretation of Problem-Reaction-Solution. A subject I've discussed prior.