Defense Attorney Bob Motta on States Telling Response To Delphi Odin Claims
Oct 04, 2023, 03:00 PM
Could the 126-page Delphi document be hiding more truths than initially perceived?
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski conversed with Defense Attorney and Host of "Defense Diaries," Bob Motta, about the controversial Delphi documents. These papers, a riveting 126 pages, are saturated with allegations of Odinistic cults killing children in the woods.
However, as Motta keenly points out, "strip away all the Odinism crap" and beneath the thick narrative, one can find unsettling facts. Amidst the bulk of pages detailing the history of Odinism, there lie statements from witnesses whose tales are hard to ignore. "The statements from these three and four guys were guys telling two of his sisters that he was there at the scene," Brueski recounts. One particularly chilling account involves a man inquiring of law enforcement: "If you found my spit on one of the girls and I was able to explain it to you. Why it was there, would I still be in trouble?" The same man's sister later approached law enforcement, alleging that her brother confessed his presence at the murder scene. She subsequently underwent a polygraph test.
According to Motta, if one were to omit the layers of Odinistic claims, the facts embedded within the document are compelling. "It seems like it could have been communicated much clearer without the extremes," Brueski mused. Motta expressed concern that the truth might be getting obscured: "The forest is getting lost in the trees." The manner in which this potentially groundbreaking evidence was presented, embedded within wild theories, raised eyebrows and turned heads.
However, the state's response to the document may hold more clues. As Brueski noted, the state described the narrative as "colorful, dramatic, and very unprofessional." Yet, a following statement intrigued both podcasters: "and it's not completely true." This assertion implies that there are indeed elements of truth within the document, begging the question, which parts are factual?
"All of the information in there... came from their own discovery," Motta stated. The defense will be able to produce the reports, proving they didn't fabricate any details. The document itself acknowledges the outlandish nature of its contents, with a section that reads: "Your honor, we realize you're going to read this and you're going to be like, this is insane. It's crazy." Yet, the defense maintains that they possess evidence to back every claim they've made.
The state's retort avoided engagement with the Odinism claims, focusing only on the forthcoming Franks hearing. "They just answered as to what's important in it, which was the Frank's hearing. That's all they did. It was eight pages, short and sweet," Motta emphasized. The defense, in contrast, wove a dense narrative, while the state's reply was direct and fact-driven.
Brueski and Motta are both gearing up for what promises to be an intense hearing. "It's going to be one of my favorite days ever in terms of covering true crime," Brueski remarked. Given the gravity of the revelations and the contrasting presentations of evidence by both sides, it's shaping up to be an unmissable event in the true crime world.
Amidst narratives of cult rituals and audacious claims, what truths will emerge from the depths of the Delphi document?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski conversed with Defense Attorney and Host of "Defense Diaries," Bob Motta, about the controversial Delphi documents. These papers, a riveting 126 pages, are saturated with allegations of Odinistic cults killing children in the woods.
However, as Motta keenly points out, "strip away all the Odinism crap" and beneath the thick narrative, one can find unsettling facts. Amidst the bulk of pages detailing the history of Odinism, there lie statements from witnesses whose tales are hard to ignore. "The statements from these three and four guys were guys telling two of his sisters that he was there at the scene," Brueski recounts. One particularly chilling account involves a man inquiring of law enforcement: "If you found my spit on one of the girls and I was able to explain it to you. Why it was there, would I still be in trouble?" The same man's sister later approached law enforcement, alleging that her brother confessed his presence at the murder scene. She subsequently underwent a polygraph test.
According to Motta, if one were to omit the layers of Odinistic claims, the facts embedded within the document are compelling. "It seems like it could have been communicated much clearer without the extremes," Brueski mused. Motta expressed concern that the truth might be getting obscured: "The forest is getting lost in the trees." The manner in which this potentially groundbreaking evidence was presented, embedded within wild theories, raised eyebrows and turned heads.
However, the state's response to the document may hold more clues. As Brueski noted, the state described the narrative as "colorful, dramatic, and very unprofessional." Yet, a following statement intrigued both podcasters: "and it's not completely true." This assertion implies that there are indeed elements of truth within the document, begging the question, which parts are factual?
"All of the information in there... came from their own discovery," Motta stated. The defense will be able to produce the reports, proving they didn't fabricate any details. The document itself acknowledges the outlandish nature of its contents, with a section that reads: "Your honor, we realize you're going to read this and you're going to be like, this is insane. It's crazy." Yet, the defense maintains that they possess evidence to back every claim they've made.
The state's retort avoided engagement with the Odinism claims, focusing only on the forthcoming Franks hearing. "They just answered as to what's important in it, which was the Frank's hearing. That's all they did. It was eight pages, short and sweet," Motta emphasized. The defense, in contrast, wove a dense narrative, while the state's reply was direct and fact-driven.
Brueski and Motta are both gearing up for what promises to be an intense hearing. "It's going to be one of my favorite days ever in terms of covering true crime," Brueski remarked. Given the gravity of the revelations and the contrasting presentations of evidence by both sides, it's shaping up to be an unmissable event in the true crime world.
Amidst narratives of cult rituals and audacious claims, what truths will emerge from the depths of the Delphi document?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com