Did Kohberger Kill to Gain Attention from Women In Jail?
Oct 30, 2023, 05:00 PM
Could a judge's subtle reactions and a courtroom filled with cameras hold the key to understanding the complex legal battle surrounding Bryan Kohberger, the defendant in a high-profile murder case? This question lingered in the air as Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, sat down with Shavaun Scott, a renowned psychotherapist and author, to dissect the recent developments in Kohberger’s court proceedings.
The conversation kicked off with Brueski expressing his intrigue over the judge's reaction to Kohberger's motion for dismissal, describing it as both unexpected and revealing. "Very creative. I think that said a lot right there," Brueski noted, capturing the uniqueness of the moment. Scott chimed in, agreeing that the judge's response was no surprise but highlighting the varied nature of judges and their courtroom demeanors. "Some of them are very stoic and very proper, and some of them really leak a lot of emotion," Scott observed, suggesting that this particular judge’s reactions were transparent and aligned with public sentiment.
However, Scott raised a critical point about the potential implications of a judge displaying their emotions in such a high-stakes trial, questioning whether it was appropriate, despite being entertaining for viewers. The conversation shifted to the contentious issue of cameras in the courtroom, a topic that has sparked debate on all sides. Both the defense and prosecution had requested the removal of cameras, while the families of the victims and the general public leaned toward transparency and access. The judge decided to keep the cameras but promised to maintain control over their presence.
Scott provided insight into why both parties might prefer the absence of cameras, citing Kohberger’s unusual reactions and the additional pressure it places on the prosecution. Brueski then steered the conversation towards Kohberger's early writings, in which he expressed feelings of disconnection and visual disturbances. Scott labeled these as red flags and emphasized the importance of early intervention, though she noted that Kohberger's trajectory suggested that the necessary help was not provided.
As the discussion delved deeper into Kohberger's personality, Scott highlighted his grandiosity, arrogance, and lack of empathy—traits commonly associated with serial killers. She underscored the difficulty individuals like Kohberger would have in maintaining intimate relationships, pointing out that his issues went far beyond simple social awkwardness.
In a thought-provoking turn, Brueski proposed a theory linking Kohberger’s alleged crimes to a twisted desire for attention from women, something he struggled to obtain in his everyday life. Scott found the theory intriguing but speculated that Kohberger may not have thought that far ahead, suggesting that his primary motive was likely the release of rage. She did, however, acknowledge the eerie phenomenon of female fan clubs that emerge around high-profile criminals, adding another layer of complexity to the case.
The podcast left listeners with a chilling contemplation: Could Kohberger's alleged heinous acts be a convoluted attempt to gain attention and acceptance in a world where he felt rejected and misunderstood? Was this a case of a deeply troubled individual lashing out in the most violent way possible, or was there a darker, more calculated motive at play? These questions linger, as the legal proceedings continue to unfold, keeping the public and experts alike fixated on the courtroom drama and
the enigmatic figure at its center.
The conversation kicked off with Brueski expressing his intrigue over the judge's reaction to Kohberger's motion for dismissal, describing it as both unexpected and revealing. "Very creative. I think that said a lot right there," Brueski noted, capturing the uniqueness of the moment. Scott chimed in, agreeing that the judge's response was no surprise but highlighting the varied nature of judges and their courtroom demeanors. "Some of them are very stoic and very proper, and some of them really leak a lot of emotion," Scott observed, suggesting that this particular judge’s reactions were transparent and aligned with public sentiment.
However, Scott raised a critical point about the potential implications of a judge displaying their emotions in such a high-stakes trial, questioning whether it was appropriate, despite being entertaining for viewers. The conversation shifted to the contentious issue of cameras in the courtroom, a topic that has sparked debate on all sides. Both the defense and prosecution had requested the removal of cameras, while the families of the victims and the general public leaned toward transparency and access. The judge decided to keep the cameras but promised to maintain control over their presence.
Scott provided insight into why both parties might prefer the absence of cameras, citing Kohberger’s unusual reactions and the additional pressure it places on the prosecution. Brueski then steered the conversation towards Kohberger's early writings, in which he expressed feelings of disconnection and visual disturbances. Scott labeled these as red flags and emphasized the importance of early intervention, though she noted that Kohberger's trajectory suggested that the necessary help was not provided.
As the discussion delved deeper into Kohberger's personality, Scott highlighted his grandiosity, arrogance, and lack of empathy—traits commonly associated with serial killers. She underscored the difficulty individuals like Kohberger would have in maintaining intimate relationships, pointing out that his issues went far beyond simple social awkwardness.
In a thought-provoking turn, Brueski proposed a theory linking Kohberger’s alleged crimes to a twisted desire for attention from women, something he struggled to obtain in his everyday life. Scott found the theory intriguing but speculated that Kohberger may not have thought that far ahead, suggesting that his primary motive was likely the release of rage. She did, however, acknowledge the eerie phenomenon of female fan clubs that emerge around high-profile criminals, adding another layer of complexity to the case.
The podcast left listeners with a chilling contemplation: Could Kohberger's alleged heinous acts be a convoluted attempt to gain attention and acceptance in a world where he felt rejected and misunderstood? Was this a case of a deeply troubled individual lashing out in the most violent way possible, or was there a darker, more calculated motive at play? These questions linger, as the legal proceedings continue to unfold, keeping the public and experts alike fixated on the courtroom drama and
the enigmatic figure at its center.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com