Was Genetic Genealogy Evidence in Kohberger Case Gathered Legally?
Nov 03, 2023, 01:00 AM
Is the battle over DNA evidence in the Bryan Kohberger case a pivotal moment for justice or a potential loophole for defense? This intriguing question sets the stage for our discussion with Lori Hellis, a former defense attorney and author, on the latest episode of "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski.
In a case as complex and high-profile as Bryan Kohberger’s, every piece of evidence, every legal motion, and every argument in court comes under intense scrutiny. The recent debate about access to genetic genealogy and DNA evidence has raised eyebrows and posed critical questions about the prosecution’s methods and the defense’s rights.
Hellis explains that while the defense does have access to the DNA evidence, what they are really after is an understanding of how the genetic genealogy led the prosecution to Kohberger, eventually linking him to his parent's house in Pennsylvania and leading to his arrest. "They want to know how the sausage is made,” Hellis puts it succinctly, emphasizing the infancy of the field of genetic genealogy and the uncharted territory the case is navigating.
In a world where commercial DNA databases have agreements in place to protect user information from law enforcement, there lies a significant challenge for the defense. They want to ensure that these databases were not misused in obtaining evidence against Kohberger. Hellis remarks, “It's a little bit difficult for them to be certain that those databases weren't misused unless they get the raw data of where these database connections were made.”
Hellis anticipates that judges will increasingly require the prosecution to provide detailed information on how they connected the dots using genetic genealogy. This move towards transparency is not only expected but necessary, as it ensures that both parties are playing fair and that the evidence brought forth is obtained legally and ethically.
But what is at stake for the defense? Hellis outlines a clear goal: to prove that the evidence was obtained in a way that violated Kohberger’s rights, making it inadmissible in court. She likens it to an illegal search, emphasizing the importance of the Fourth Amendment in protecting citizens' rights against unlawful searches and seizures.
If the defense is successful in proving that the evidence was obtained illegally, it could deal a significant blow to the prosecution’s case. However, Hellis argues that while it would weaken the case, it may not be fatal. There are other pieces of evidence and indications of probable cause that could potentially underpin Kohberger’s arrest and the subsequent search of his parent's home.
Hellis’s insights highlight a critical aspect of the legal system: the importance of transparency, legality, and ethical conduct in the pursuit of justice. She points out that while the government has nearly unlimited resources, the defendant often does not, underscoring the necessity for both parties to play fair and observe the rules.
As our discussion with Lori Hellis comes to a close, we are left with another intriguing question: How will the fight over DNA evidence and genetic genealogy impact the Bryan Kohberger case, and what does it mean for the future of legal proceedings in such complex and high-profile cases? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the legal community and the public will be watching closely, ensuring that justice is served, and rights are protected.
In a case as complex and high-profile as Bryan Kohberger’s, every piece of evidence, every legal motion, and every argument in court comes under intense scrutiny. The recent debate about access to genetic genealogy and DNA evidence has raised eyebrows and posed critical questions about the prosecution’s methods and the defense’s rights.
Hellis explains that while the defense does have access to the DNA evidence, what they are really after is an understanding of how the genetic genealogy led the prosecution to Kohberger, eventually linking him to his parent's house in Pennsylvania and leading to his arrest. "They want to know how the sausage is made,” Hellis puts it succinctly, emphasizing the infancy of the field of genetic genealogy and the uncharted territory the case is navigating.
In a world where commercial DNA databases have agreements in place to protect user information from law enforcement, there lies a significant challenge for the defense. They want to ensure that these databases were not misused in obtaining evidence against Kohberger. Hellis remarks, “It's a little bit difficult for them to be certain that those databases weren't misused unless they get the raw data of where these database connections were made.”
Hellis anticipates that judges will increasingly require the prosecution to provide detailed information on how they connected the dots using genetic genealogy. This move towards transparency is not only expected but necessary, as it ensures that both parties are playing fair and that the evidence brought forth is obtained legally and ethically.
But what is at stake for the defense? Hellis outlines a clear goal: to prove that the evidence was obtained in a way that violated Kohberger’s rights, making it inadmissible in court. She likens it to an illegal search, emphasizing the importance of the Fourth Amendment in protecting citizens' rights against unlawful searches and seizures.
If the defense is successful in proving that the evidence was obtained illegally, it could deal a significant blow to the prosecution’s case. However, Hellis argues that while it would weaken the case, it may not be fatal. There are other pieces of evidence and indications of probable cause that could potentially underpin Kohberger’s arrest and the subsequent search of his parent's home.
Hellis’s insights highlight a critical aspect of the legal system: the importance of transparency, legality, and ethical conduct in the pursuit of justice. She points out that while the government has nearly unlimited resources, the defendant often does not, underscoring the necessity for both parties to play fair and observe the rules.
As our discussion with Lori Hellis comes to a close, we are left with another intriguing question: How will the fight over DNA evidence and genetic genealogy impact the Bryan Kohberger case, and what does it mean for the future of legal proceedings in such complex and high-profile cases? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the legal community and the public will be watching closely, ensuring that justice is served, and rights are protected.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com