Attorney Eric Faddis Explains How Judge's Have VERY LITTLE Accountability For Decisions

Feb 02, 10:00 PM

Is justice being served in the Delphi murder case? This question resonates strongly as new developments emerge in the case of Richard Allen, accused of a harrowing crime. The recent handling of Allen's situation, particularly his prison conditions and denied rights, has sparked a heated debate about the integrity of the legal system in Indiana.
In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski, along with attorney Eric Faddis, delved into the complexities surrounding Allen's case. The discussion highlighted the apparent violations of Allen's legal rights and the judiciary's questionable decisions.
Allen's attorneys have raised alarms over his treatment in prison, likening his conditions to those of Hannibal Lecter. According to Faddis, Allen's inability to communicate privately with his legal team is “asinine” and a direct violation of his rights. “Are you telling me that there is not some secured cell in that whole incarceration facility in which Richard Allen could meet privately with his attorneys?” Faddis questions, highlighting the gravity of this oversight.
Another point of contention is the denial of Allen’s right to a speedy trial, a fundamental legal right. Despite requests from Allen and his attorneys, the Indiana Supreme Court has denied this motion. This decision raises serious concerns about the commitment of the legal system to uphold basic constitutional rights. “How are these things going on where we say you have these rights? It’s right in front of all of us,” Brueski emphasizes.
The role of Judge Gull in this case has come under intense scrutiny. Accusations of bias and unilateral decision-making without proper hearings have cast doubt on the fairness of the proceedings. Faddis points out that judges, being former lawyers, sometimes use their skills to navigate around the law, potentially leading to unjust outcomes.
One of the most troubling aspects highlighted in the discussion is the lack of accountability for judges who deviate from the law. “Is there really some deterrent for these judges to not go rogue and just decide whatever they want? There isn’t a huge deterrent,” Faddis admits. This lack of checks and balances in the judicial system poses a significant threat to the principle of justice.
While some judges are elected and thus somewhat accountable to public opinion, Faddis notes that disciplinary actions for not following the law are rare. This raises concerns about the power judges hold and the potential for abuse of this power.
As the case progresses, the legal community and the public are closely monitoring the developments. The handling of Richard Allen’s case not only affects the immediate parties involved but also reflects on the broader judicial system’s ability to administer justice fairly.
In a legal landscape where a defendant’s basic rights are being questioned, the integrity of the entire system comes under scrutiny. Will Richard Allen receive a fair trial, or will the legal system fail him? The answers to these questions will have far-reaching implications for the rule of law and public trust in the judicial process.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com