Will Mistakes From The Judge In Karen Read Case Prohibit A Re-Trial?
Jul 19, 07:00 PM
In the "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski" podcast episode, Defense Attorney Bob Motta discussed the defense arguments for Karen Read's case. The defense claims that the jury was unanimous on some charges being not guilty, based on affidavits from Alan Jackson and others. Motta emphasized the importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about whether the jury was deadlocked on all counts. He explained the concept of double jeopardy and how it could impact Read's case if the mistrial was improperly declared. The discussion also covered the procedural nuances and ethical considerations, including the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury about their verdicts. Motta highlighted the potential complexities of retrying the case and the significance of preserving objections for appeal. The conversation provided insights into the legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial, underscoring the importance of proper legal procedures and the challenges faced by both the defense and prosecution.
### Main Points
- Defense arguments based on affidavits claiming jury unanimity on some not guilty charges for Karen Read.
- Importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about the deadlock.
- Discussion of double jeopardy and its implications for Read's case.
- Procedural nuances and the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury.
- Potential complexities and challenges of retrying the case.
- Significance of preserving objections for appeal.
- Legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial.
### Hashtags
#KarenRead #AlanJackson #DefenseDiaries #TonyBrueski #DoubleJeopardy #JuryDeliberation #LegalEthics
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
### Main Points
- Defense arguments based on affidavits claiming jury unanimity on some not guilty charges for Karen Read.
- Importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about the deadlock.
- Discussion of double jeopardy and its implications for Read's case.
- Procedural nuances and the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury.
- Potential complexities and challenges of retrying the case.
- Significance of preserving objections for appeal.
- Legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial.
### Hashtags
#KarenRead #AlanJackson #DefenseDiaries #TonyBrueski #DoubleJeopardy #JuryDeliberation #LegalEthics
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com