QROT-127: A Simple Reframe Puts 7/13 in Clear Focus
Jul 16, 04:13 PM
(Oops, thought I had posted this yesterday morning.)
There is no need to overanalyze the nuances of what the Secret Service did or did not do. The answer is more plain than that.
THEY HAD MICROPHONES.
ALL they had to do was communicate and move him or cover him within seconds of getting the communication of a threat.
The conclusion pivot of "deliberate or horrible mistake" is NOT...
... about whether or not there was one shooter,
... or why didn't they cover him better in case there was two,
... or why didn't they eliminate the threat when people were indicating (they sure as hell did within 10 seconds of him firing!!),
... or why they didn't have rooftops covered the usual half mile out.
Those questions are there but the CONCLUSIVE evidence is just much simpler.
There is no nuance.
ÀLL they had to do was use their microphones to communicate to the other team members so the President could be covered or moved.
And They.
Did.
Not.
OR the communication was blocked.
OR those on stage, multiple agents, did not respond to do their most basic protective duty. (I'm not going to Vegas on those odds).
It doesn't mean any particular one of them is to blame.
But it does mean...
at least one person very deliberately KEPT the President from being covered when there was the easiest solution - merely give and react to the basic message of "Cover him - we have a threat."
They had earpieces.
====================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
There is no need to overanalyze the nuances of what the Secret Service did or did not do. The answer is more plain than that.
THEY HAD MICROPHONES.
ALL they had to do was communicate and move him or cover him within seconds of getting the communication of a threat.
The conclusion pivot of "deliberate or horrible mistake" is NOT...
... about whether or not there was one shooter,
... or why didn't they cover him better in case there was two,
... or why didn't they eliminate the threat when people were indicating (they sure as hell did within 10 seconds of him firing!!),
... or why they didn't have rooftops covered the usual half mile out.
Those questions are there but the CONCLUSIVE evidence is just much simpler.
There is no nuance.
ÀLL they had to do was use their microphones to communicate to the other team members so the President could be covered or moved.
And They.
Did.
Not.
OR the communication was blocked.
OR those on stage, multiple agents, did not respond to do their most basic protective duty. (I'm not going to Vegas on those odds).
It doesn't mean any particular one of them is to blame.
But it does mean...
at least one person very deliberately KEPT the President from being covered when there was the easiest solution - merely give and react to the basic message of "Cover him - we have a threat."
They had earpieces.
====================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!