TSOT110: Free Newman - A Common Sense Analysis of the Principles of a World Saving Concept
Jan 25, 09:01 PM
Share
Subscribe
An analysis of an incredibly important discovery / observation that could make ALL the difference for resources being able to get to where they need to get in the world. For the world ACTUALLY being cleaner, without the need for a scarcity mentality that is convenient for those (financially) elite that push the need for control.
As you listen to the details of the machine allowing batteries to pull a large physical load, imagine for comparison how long your car battery could rotate your starter if it had to try to do it continuously.
- A lack of an answer as to what SOURCE of energy we may be tapping into to "produce more energy than we started with" is not "breaking the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics". It is instead proof that we are tapping into a source we are not currently measuring. It should be the reason to SHOUT and the reason for great EXCITEMENT. Not the reason to silence those whose results show it.
- Finding more efficiency, as EXPECTED by your OWN known formulas (I-squared-R losses) does not mean anything fundamentally astounding is going on. It is instead just proof that the application of the principles is itself more efficient DUE to properly taking advantage of the law.
- If you compare how much electrical power is needed to drive a certain physical load using a standard configuration to drive it, and then compare it to something that is by definition much more efficient, then the fact that less power is needed does not show violation of any law. Instead it simply shows what we knew - the latter is more efficient, so less power is needed.
That is... Power equals current times voltage. Therefore theoretically the same power can be produced by doubling the voltage and halving the current, or by doubling the current and halving the voltage. But if you double the amperage then you have greater losses and less efficiency, so with that setup you need more voltage to get the same power output.
- Magnetism is a key and utter wonder of the world, that is by principle and observation untapped: relative motion between an electrical conductor (for example, a copper wire) and a magnetic field induces current through the conductor. This is the key to 99.9999% of all electrical power generation on the planet. It is just a matter of what fuel (wind, gas, water) creates the relative motion. Yet the necessary element - the magnet that creates the field, does not proportionately "empty" based on the amount of electrical current that is produced. It is, practically, an infinite source. It is but a TRIGGER, seemingly. . . a catalyst. . . a conduit that is allowing us to take advantage of some other phenomenon. It is as though the "field" is always there, but it is the magnetic lines of force are what arranges it in a way by which it can be used to induce.
I delved into this topic off of just being reminded of it, after I first learned about it in the early youtube days or before. I may have follow-up episodes
For a fuller rendition note the video documentary that jogged my memory, and from which I pulled some of the information here - "Newman"
If you can watch that documentary and not have tears in your eyes over the implications of the differences in approach this technology can make to the world, then I think you just weren't able to focus on the video enough.
I believe that likely Newman "stumbled upon" principles that another legend who died near penniless knew. Newman, like Tesla, was buffeted and rejected in getting his discovery to mainstream acceptance, as, ironically, "the machine" with all of its mysterious human cogs behind the scenes refused to validate him and his incredible discovery, opting instead for profit over efficiency, sales over truth.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
As you listen to the details of the machine allowing batteries to pull a large physical load, imagine for comparison how long your car battery could rotate your starter if it had to try to do it continuously.
- A lack of an answer as to what SOURCE of energy we may be tapping into to "produce more energy than we started with" is not "breaking the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics". It is instead proof that we are tapping into a source we are not currently measuring. It should be the reason to SHOUT and the reason for great EXCITEMENT. Not the reason to silence those whose results show it.
- Finding more efficiency, as EXPECTED by your OWN known formulas (I-squared-R losses) does not mean anything fundamentally astounding is going on. It is instead just proof that the application of the principles is itself more efficient DUE to properly taking advantage of the law.
- If you compare how much electrical power is needed to drive a certain physical load using a standard configuration to drive it, and then compare it to something that is by definition much more efficient, then the fact that less power is needed does not show violation of any law. Instead it simply shows what we knew - the latter is more efficient, so less power is needed.
That is... Power equals current times voltage. Therefore theoretically the same power can be produced by doubling the voltage and halving the current, or by doubling the current and halving the voltage. But if you double the amperage then you have greater losses and less efficiency, so with that setup you need more voltage to get the same power output.
- Magnetism is a key and utter wonder of the world, that is by principle and observation untapped: relative motion between an electrical conductor (for example, a copper wire) and a magnetic field induces current through the conductor. This is the key to 99.9999% of all electrical power generation on the planet. It is just a matter of what fuel (wind, gas, water) creates the relative motion. Yet the necessary element - the magnet that creates the field, does not proportionately "empty" based on the amount of electrical current that is produced. It is, practically, an infinite source. It is but a TRIGGER, seemingly. . . a catalyst. . . a conduit that is allowing us to take advantage of some other phenomenon. It is as though the "field" is always there, but it is the magnetic lines of force are what arranges it in a way by which it can be used to induce.
I delved into this topic off of just being reminded of it, after I first learned about it in the early youtube days or before. I may have follow-up episodes
For a fuller rendition note the video documentary that jogged my memory, and from which I pulled some of the information here - "Newman"
If you can watch that documentary and not have tears in your eyes over the implications of the differences in approach this technology can make to the world, then I think you just weren't able to focus on the video enough.
I believe that likely Newman "stumbled upon" principles that another legend who died near penniless knew. Newman, like Tesla, was buffeted and rejected in getting his discovery to mainstream acceptance, as, ironically, "the machine" with all of its mysterious human cogs behind the scenes refused to validate him and his incredible discovery, opting instead for profit over efficiency, sales over truth.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!