Lindsay Clancy: Why One Couple Couldn't Survive Disagreeing About Her Trial

Sep 10, 12:00 PM
Share
Subscribe

The Lindsay Clancy mistrial left the legal question unresolved — and the personal ones got worse. A man claims he ended a $200,000 engagement after his fiancée expressed sympathy for Clancy and told him he would never understand postpartum illness. He put the breakup on TikTok and called her a monster. Four million people watched and picked sides.

The jury heard six weeks of evidence and couldn't reach a verdict after thirty-eight hours of deliberation. People at home are ending relationships over the same question in a single conversation.

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony Brueski to examine why the Clancy case turns disagreement into a verdict on someone's character, why grief and compassion have become mutually exclusive in this conversation, and what happens to mothers right now who are afraid to admit what they recognize in Lindsay's story.

The mistrial sent the jury home. It sent the rest of us to war.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #Nightbird #MentalHealth #Motherhood #TrueCrimePodcast